-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8343148: C2: Refactor uses of "PhaseValue::*con*() + PhaseIdealLoop::set_ctrl()" into separate method #21836
8343148: C2: Refactor uses of "PhaseValue::*con*() + PhaseIdealLoop::set_ctrl()" into separate method #21836
Conversation
…::set_ctrl()" into separate method
Hi @theoweidmannoracle, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing! We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user theoweidmannoracle" as summary for the issue. If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing |
@theoweidmannoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 627 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@vnkozlov, @chhagedorn, @TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@theoweidmannoracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
While at it, we could extend this to the other constant creation methods |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have other places (not new constant node) where we set Root as control?
May be we can add set_root_as_ctrl(n)
method in loop node.hpp
in such case.
In loop opts. |
There's only three locations where control is set to the root in the loop files now (not counting the ones in the new methods I added). The main reason for this patch is bugs caused by people forgetting to set control for constants (e.g. https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343137), which is now prevented if the new helper methods are used. Do you think there would be any benefit from introducing |
Co-authored-by: Emanuel Peter <emanuel.peter@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Emanuel Peter <emanuel.peter@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Emanuel Peter <emanuel.peter@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Emanuel Peter <emanuel.peter@oracle.com>
My suggesting is about additional cleaning code. I think 3 + 5 places are enough to justify to have a new function in header file. Also |
@vnkozlov I implemented your suggestion. Would you like to take another look? (It also helped me discover some more cases which can be replaced with the new *con*() functions.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. I have few additional comments.
ConINode* zero = igvn->intcon(0); | ||
if (iloop != nullptr) { | ||
iloop->set_ctrl(zero, igvn->C->root()); | ||
iloop->set_root_as_ctrl(zero); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please look on history of this code. This is suspicious - constant nodes should be always attached to Root.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TobiHartmann Pointed out that this method is also called from code outside of loop opts, for example, PhaseMacroExpand::expand_macro_nodes
. Since there's no PhaseIdealLoop in this case, nullptr is passed instead and we cannot set control as we are not inside a loop opt.
Maybe @rwestrel can also take a look as he originally introduced this code in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. That is what (iloop != nullptr)
check for.
@theoweidmannoracle this pull request can not be integrated into git checkout JDK-8343148
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some last minor comments, otherwise the updates look good to me. Thanks for doing this extended refactoring!
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
@vnkozlov Could you take another look at the latest changes? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Nice cleanup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This version looks good.
/integrate |
@theoweidmannoracle |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit e88e793.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@chhagedorn @theoweidmannoracle Pushed as commit e88e793. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This patch introduces the methods
PhaseIdealLoop::intcon
andPhaseIdealLoop::longcon
which are wrappers for:and
Occurrences of this pattern in loopnode.cpp were replaced with the appropriate call to the new methods.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21836/head:pull/21836
$ git checkout pull/21836
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21836
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21836/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21836
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21836
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21836.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment