Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8343477: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (compiler) #21851

Closed

Conversation

archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor

@archiecobbs archiecobbs commented Nov 2, 2024

Please review this patch which removes unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 2 Reviewers)

Issue

  • JDK-8343477: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (compiler) (Sub-task - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21851/head:pull/21851
$ git checkout pull/21851

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21851
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21851/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21851

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21851

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21851.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 2, 2024

👋 Welcome back acobbs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2024

@archiecobbs This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8343477: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (compiler)

Reviewed-by: darcy, mcimadamore

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 94 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dbffe33: 8345263: Make sure that lint categories are used correctly when logging lint warnings
  • 32c8195: 8345801: C2: Clean up include statements to speed up compilation when touching type.hpp
  • 9286018: 8345322: RISC-V: Add concurrent gtests for cmpxchg variants
  • 4fc43b0: 8345770: javadoc: API documentation builds are not always reproducible
  • ee1c5ad: 8345975: Update SAP SE copyright year to 2024 where it was missed
  • 3518b4b: 8344171: Clone and initialize Assertion Predicates in order instead of in reverse-order
  • c88e081: 8346160: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings from explicit casts
  • ab1dbd4: 8346202: Correct typo in SQLPermission
  • 6b022bb: 8344453: Test jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestSanityDefault.java timed out
  • 3b9de11: 8319875: Add macOS implementation for jcmd System.map
  • ... and 84 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/cc628a133e471e7edf07831ff386f0eaf57e9bff...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2024

@archiecobbs The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build
  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added build build-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels Nov 2, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Webrevs

@magicus
Copy link
Member

magicus commented Nov 4, 2024

/label -build

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2024

@magicus
The build label was successfully removed.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@archiecobbs This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

/pingbot

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2024

@archiecobbs Unknown command pingbot - for a list of valid commands use /help.

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member

jddarcy commented Dec 9, 2024

/reviewers 2 reviewer

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 9, 2024

@jddarcy
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 2 Reviewers).

Copy link
Member

@jddarcy jddarcy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine; thanks for the cleanup @archiecobbs .

Bumped the reviewer count so someone who more directly works on javac will take a look too.

@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ public void visitArray(Attribute.Array a) {
}
}

@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tricky but correct :-) This relies on the special pleading for casts to "raw" Class

@@ -2891,7 +2890,6 @@ JCStatement parseStatementAsBlock() {

/**This method parses a statement appearing inside a block.
*/
@SuppressWarnings("fallthrough")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a bit tricky. Yes, as things stand the suppression is redundant. But the switch does contain a case with fallthrough - only it's the last case, so the fallthrough does nothing. If a default is added (or some other case after the last) the fallthrough will become more apparent. (but then a warnings should be issued as well). Considering we have already a comment to indicate the fallthrough, this change is ok.

Copy link
Contributor

@mcimadamore mcimadamore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good - nice cleanup!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 16, 2024
@archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review!

@archiecobbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Going to push as commit d737978.
Since your change was applied there have been 96 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8133eb2: 8346150: Jib dependency on autoconf missing for 'docs' profile
  • 45a3297: 8346248: serviceability/dcmd/vm/{SystemMapTest.java,SystemMapTest.java} failing on macos-aarch64
  • dbffe33: 8345263: Make sure that lint categories are used correctly when logging lint warnings
  • 32c8195: 8345801: C2: Clean up include statements to speed up compilation when touching type.hpp
  • 9286018: 8345322: RISC-V: Add concurrent gtests for cmpxchg variants
  • 4fc43b0: 8345770: javadoc: API documentation builds are not always reproducible
  • ee1c5ad: 8345975: Update SAP SE copyright year to 2024 where it was missed
  • 3518b4b: 8344171: Clone and initialize Assertion Predicates in order instead of in reverse-order
  • c88e081: 8346160: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings from explicit casts
  • ab1dbd4: 8346202: Correct typo in SQLPermission
  • ... and 86 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/cc628a133e471e7edf07831ff386f0eaf57e9bff...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 16, 2024

@archiecobbs Pushed as commit d737978.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants