-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8343477: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (compiler) #21851
8343477: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (compiler) #21851
Conversation
👋 Welcome back acobbs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@archiecobbs This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 94 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@archiecobbs The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
/label -build |
@magicus |
@archiecobbs This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
/pingbot |
@archiecobbs Unknown command |
/reviewers 2 reviewer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine; thanks for the cleanup @archiecobbs .
Bumped the reviewer count so someone who more directly works on javac will take a look too.
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ public void visitArray(Attribute.Array a) { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"}) | |||
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tricky but correct :-) This relies on the special pleading for casts to "raw" Class
@@ -2891,7 +2890,6 @@ JCStatement parseStatementAsBlock() { | |||
|
|||
/**This method parses a statement appearing inside a block. | |||
*/ | |||
@SuppressWarnings("fallthrough") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit tricky. Yes, as things stand the suppression is redundant. But the switch does contain a case with fallthrough - only it's the last case
, so the fallthrough does nothing. If a default
is added (or some other case
after the last) the fallthrough will become more apparent. (but then a warnings should be issued as well). Considering we have already a comment to indicate the fallthrough, this change is ok.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good - nice cleanup!
Thanks for the review! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit d737978.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@archiecobbs Pushed as commit d737978. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please review this patch which removes unnecessary
@SuppressWarnings
annotations.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21851/head:pull/21851
$ git checkout pull/21851
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21851
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21851/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21851
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21851
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21851.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment