-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8339162: [REDO] JDK-8338440 Parallel: Improve fragmentation mitigation in Full GC #21872
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@lgxbslgx @zhengyu123 @walulyai Could you take a look? |
👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Shouldn't the contributors in the original be added to this redo?
/contributor add gli |
@albertnetymk |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Nice found. The region_align_up
is not the next_region_start_address
.
Even an experienced developer would misuse the function |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks for review. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 423e8e0.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 423e8e0. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR consists of two commits, the original and bug-fix.
The original patch calculates the dest-count for the preceding live words incorrectly --
preceding_destination
can be on region-boundary.Test: TEST=gc/TestSoftReferencesBehaviorOnOOME.java fails ~4/100 without the fix but passes with the fix.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Contributors
<gli@openjdk.org>
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21872/head:pull/21872
$ git checkout pull/21872
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21872
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21872/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21872
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21872
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21872.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment