-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
8343067: C2: revisit constant-offset AddP chains after successful input idealizations #21898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8343067: C2: revisit constant-offset AddP chains after successful input idealizations #21898
Conversation
👋 Welcome back rcastanedalo! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@robcasloz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 86 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@robcasloz The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
src/hotspot/share/opto/phaseX.cpp
Outdated
worklist.push(u); | ||
} else if (n == use->in(AddPNode::Offset) && |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
n == use->in(AddPNode::Offset)
result can be saved outside loop in local var.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, done (commit deb7c4e).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit ec13364.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@robcasloz Pushed as commit ec13364. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This changeset re-adds a constant-offset AddP node (
u
) to C2's IGVN worklist when its address is given by another AddP node (use
) whose offset has changed. This makes it possible forAddPNode::Ideal
to flatten the address computation in cases where the offset of the latter (use->in(AddPNode::Offset)
) is found to be constant during IGVN:The end result is the generation of fewer explicit address computation instructions.
Testing
Functionality
Performance
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21898/head:pull/21898
$ git checkout pull/21898
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21898
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21898/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21898
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21898
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21898.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment