Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8339892: Several security shell tests don't set TESTJAVAOPTS #21916

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member

@SoniaZaldana SoniaZaldana commented Nov 5, 2024

Hi all,

This PR addresses 8339892 enabling several security shell tests to set TESTJAVAOPTS.

Cheers,
Sonia


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8339892: Several security shell tests don't set TESTJAVAOPTS (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21916/head:pull/21916
$ git checkout pull/21916

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21916
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21916/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21916

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21916

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21916.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 5, 2024

👋 Welcome back szaldana! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 5, 2024

@SoniaZaldana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8339892: Several security shell tests don't set TESTJAVAOPTS

Reviewed-by: valeriep

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e33dc13: 8343343: Misc crash dump improvements on more platforms after JDK-8294160
  • d20ccd1: 8335583: Avoid using pointers in CDS tables
  • 342fe42: 8342270: Test sun/security/pkcs11/Provider/RequiredMechCheck.java needs write access to src tree
  • 78b378a: 8342540: InterfaceCalls micro-benchmark gives misleading results
  • c0e6c3b: 8343214: Fix encoding errors in APX New Data Destination Instructions Support
  • 0be7118: 8279016: JFR Leak Profiler is broken with Shenandoah
  • 6811a11: 8341408: Implement JEP 488: Primitive Types in Patterns, instanceof, and switch (Second Preview)
  • 72a45dd: 8341834: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" due to Replicate
  • 57c3bb6: 8343068: C2: CastX2P Ideal transformation not always applied
  • 83f3d42: 8339303: C2: dead node after failing to match cloned address expression
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3fab8e37bbebbb3930108b2015efe488b1fa1e97...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 5, 2024

@SoniaZaldana The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 5, 2024
@SoniaZaldana SoniaZaldana marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 14:28
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 6, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@valeriepeng valeriepeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me. Thanks~

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 6, 2024
@SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @valeriepeng!

@SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Going to push as commit 8a2a75e.
Since your change was applied there have been 99 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 50b6e41: 8300732: Whitebox functions for Metaspace test should use byte size
  • 67d1ef1: 8344018: Remove unlimited memory setting from TestScalarReplacementMaxLiveNodes
  • 5729227: 8343250: ArrayBlockingQueue serialization not thread safe
  • 2c1e4c3: 8343600: RISC-V: enable CRC32 intrinsic when either Zba or RVV are supported
  • 3727f40: 8343745: Only update Last Value Assertion Predicates in Loop Unrolling
  • b53ee05: 8202617: javadoc generates broken links to undocumented (e.g. private) members
  • cfe719f: 8340565: Create separate index page for terms defined by the index tag
  • baabfbb: 8341904: Search tag in inherited doc comment creates additional index item
  • 4fa760a: 8343936: Adjust timeout in test javax/management/monitor/DerivedGaugeMonitorTest.java
  • cbf4dd5: 8343555: RISC-V: make some verified (on hardware) extension options diagnostic
  • ... and 89 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3fab8e37bbebbb3930108b2015efe488b1fa1e97...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@SoniaZaldana Pushed as commit 8a2a75e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants