Skip to content

8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException #21993

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls commented Nov 8, 2024

Looks like EmptyDomainNotificationTest has been working by accident for nearly 20 years.
Removing notifications when not specifying a domain part of the ObjectName has actually been failing, but calling removeNotificationListener() without a domain has not been sharing the Exception.

ServerNotifForwarder.removeNotificationListener DOES need to add a domain part to an ObjectName that does not have one.

ServerNotifForwarder.addNotificationListener was changed in JDK-6238731, which is what this test is testing.

There is a numeric ID, BUT it still calls removeNotificationListener(ObjectName name, Integer listenerID) it does matter that the ObjectName does not match.

Maybe the failure to record and throw the Exceptions was the reason it was thought the numeric ID made the domain unnecessary.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21993/head:pull/21993
$ git checkout pull/21993

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21993
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21993/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21993

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21993

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21993.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 8, 2024

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2024

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8343838: Test EmptyDomainNotificationTest.java fails with ListenerNotFoundException

Reviewed-by: dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 36e1295: 8343929: Remove PreservedMarksSet::createTask() after JDK-8305895
  • b1a9491: 8343321: Bad verify in LockStack::oops_do()
  • cbe8448: 8268895: Do not filter out man pages from build
  • ec13364: 8343067: C2: revisit constant-offset AddP chains after successful input idealizations
  • 5ca6698: 8341176: Permit access to diagnostics for transient snippets
  • a93bd9d: 8343810: [s390x] is_uimm* methods should take unsigned arguments
  • f12c370: 8343118: [TESTBUG] java/awt/PrintJob/PrintCheckboxTest/PrintCheckboxManualTest.java fails with rror. Can't find HTML file PrintCheckboxManualTest.html
  • ae6bb3c: 8343824: Remove unused InstructionFlags in C1
  • 5b2f7f3: 8343837: Remove unnecessary reinterpret_cast from C2AccessValuePtr

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2024

@kevinjwalls The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 8, 2024
@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 22:42
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 8, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems reasonable.

As we are approaching 400 failures of this test in the CI I'd like to see it integrated ASAP.

Thanks

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 10, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to add the test to the ProblemList, so please remove it again. Thanks

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 11, 2024
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated with problemlist removal.
Clean run from tier3 testing.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 11, 2024
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks David!

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Going to push as commit 5016132.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 36e1295: 8343929: Remove PreservedMarksSet::createTask() after JDK-8305895
  • b1a9491: 8343321: Bad verify in LockStack::oops_do()
  • cbe8448: 8268895: Do not filter out man pages from build
  • ec13364: 8343067: C2: revisit constant-offset AddP chains after successful input idealizations
  • 5ca6698: 8341176: Permit access to diagnostics for transient snippets
  • a93bd9d: 8343810: [s390x] is_uimm* methods should take unsigned arguments
  • f12c370: 8343118: [TESTBUG] java/awt/PrintJob/PrintCheckboxTest/PrintCheckboxManualTest.java fails with rror. Can't find HTML file PrintCheckboxManualTest.html
  • ae6bb3c: 8343824: Remove unused InstructionFlags in C1
  • 5b2f7f3: 8343837: Remove unnecessary reinterpret_cast from C2AccessValuePtr

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 11, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 11, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 11, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2024

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 5016132.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants