-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8332268: C2: Add missing optimizations for UDivI/L and UModI/L and unify the shared logic with the signed nodes #22061
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8332268: C2: Add missing optimizations for UDivI/L and UModI/L and unify the shared logic with the signed nodes #22061
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back theoweidmannoracle! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@theoweidmannoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 234 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TobiHartmann, @eme64, @merykitty, @chhagedorn) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
@theoweidmannoracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
This seems similar to #9947 . Feel free to take over if you are working on this as I am not working on the PR right now and I forgot which state it is in. |
|
@merykitty Thanks for the pointer. If I understand correctly, your PR is more focused on improving division by applying numerical transformations, while the focus of this PR is to add basic optimizations to unsigned division and modulo (such as division by 1) and test the optimizations present for signed division. So I think your PR would indeed complement this PR very well. |
Webrevs
|
TobiHartmann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me otherwise. Nice tests!
test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c2/irTests/ModINodeIdealizationTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eme64
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice improvements, some comments/ questions below about testing.
chhagedorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing the cases! Some minor variable renaming suggestions for the existing code that you moved. Otherwise, looks good to me, too.
…i.java Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
…acle/jdk into unsigned-div-opts
|
@chhagedorn Thanks for the suggestions. I renamed the variables. |
|
|
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn@oracle.com>
|
/integrate |
|
@theoweidmannoracle This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration. |
|
/integrate |
|
@theoweidmannoracle |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit d381d58.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@chhagedorn @theoweidmannoracle Pushed as commit d381d58. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR introduces
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22061/head:pull/22061$ git checkout pull/22061Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22061$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22061/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22061View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22061Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22061.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment