Skip to content

8344205: [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not found #22109

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

reinrich
Copy link
Member

@reinrich reinrich commented Nov 14, 2024

This PR removes the bad assertion that fails when leaving a continuation because the cookie value is not found in frame::common_abi::cr.
This is because after the cookie is stored there when entering the continuation it is overridden by the runtime call to thaw frames. This is compliant with the abi.
Strangely the assertion only ever failed on aix.

Testing: compiler/codecache/stress/UnexpectedDeoptimizationTest.java always failed since the bad assertion was introduced recently. It succeeds after removal.

The fix passed our CI testing:
Tier 1-4 of hotspot and jdk. All of Langtools and jaxp. Renaissance Suite and SAP specific tests.
Testing was done on the main platforms and also on Linux/PPC64le and AIX.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8344205: [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not found (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22109/head:pull/22109
$ git checkout pull/22109

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22109
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22109/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22109

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22109

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22109.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 14, 2024

👋 Welcome back rrich! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@reinrich This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8344205: [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not found

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 29 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3c38ed4: 8344314: Revert removal of jdk.internal.java.PreviewFeature.CLASSFILE_API
  • 40a055e: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration
  • 84ffb64: 8334714: Implement JEP 484: Class-File API
  • 6cdebf0: 8343599: Kmem limit and max values swapped when printing container information
  • a672138: 8344161: Argument type mismatch for jfr_type_id
  • 3245f56: 8344164: [s390x] ProblemList hotspot/jtreg/runtime/NMT/VirtualAllocCommitMerge.java
  • 5e27608: 8344188: Cleanup sun.net.www.protocol.jar.JarFileFactory after JEP 486 integration
  • ba39321: 8343881: java.lang.classfile.Attribute attributeName() method should return Utf8Entry
  • 75c651f: 8327156: Avoid copying in StringTable::intern(oop, TRAPS)
  • 3eece6e: 8341907: javac -Xlint should ignore /// on first line of source file
  • ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/752e1629555f0ec8630373ec87b049afdd709ea6...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8344205 [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not foundRemove bad assertion 8344205: [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not foundRemove bad assertion Nov 14, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@reinrich The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 14, 2024
@reinrich reinrich changed the title 8344205: [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not foundRemove bad assertion 8344205: [PPC]: failing assertion: sharedRuntime_ppc.cpp:1652: cookie not found Nov 14, 2024
@reinrich
Copy link
Member Author

The macos-x64 test failure is unrelated.

@reinrich reinrich marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2024 07:50
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 15, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and trivial.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 15, 2024
@reinrich
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for reviewing, Martin. I'll integrate this as a trivial change now.
Cheers, Richard.
/integrage

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2024

@reinrich Unknown command integrage - for a list of valid commands use /help.

@reinrich
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Going to push as commit 4a7ce1d.
Since your change was applied there have been 56 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b6c2122: 8316151: [macos14] ActionListenerCalledTwiceTest.java fails on macOS 14
  • 543e355: 8344298: Test tools/sincechecker/modules/jdk.hotspot.agent/JdkHotspotAgentCheckSince.java fails on platforms without sa
  • 92b2631: 8327652: S390x: Implements SLP support
  • a47d9ba: 8344349: Problemlist jdk/jfr/jvm/TestVirtualThreadExclusion.java before JDK-8344199 resolved
  • 80e37a9: 8344265: RISC-V: Remove unused function get_previous_sp_entry
  • e1c4b49: 8343237: Improve the copying of the available set of Currencies
  • 41a627b: 8343876: Enhancements to jpackage test lib
  • aa10ec7: 8343123: Nimbus: javax/swing/JInternalFrame/bug6726866.java does not have green undecorated window
  • fec0d1c: 8343777: Add since checker tests to Internationalisation modules
  • d0b770c: 8344289: SM cleanup in jdk.internal.util
  • ... and 46 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/752e1629555f0ec8630373ec87b049afdd709ea6...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 18, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 18, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 18, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2024

@reinrich Pushed as commit 4a7ce1d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@reinrich reinrich deleted the aix_vthreads_issue branch January 24, 2025 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants