-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8345156: C2: Add bailouts next to a few asserts #22482
Conversation
👋 Welcome back danielogh! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@danielogh This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 163 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@vnkozlov, @eme64) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@danielogh The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How you found places where to add failing()
check?
To be useful it should be preceded by a failure recording.
verify_anti_dependences(block, n); | ||
if (C->failing()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see where record_failure()
is called from verify_anti_dependences()
.
LCA = insert_anti_dependences(LCA, self); | ||
if (C->failing()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here. I don't see where record_failure()
is called from insert_anti_dependences()
.
And there are a lot of assets there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is intended to cover insert_anti_dependences
: memory_early_block
: assert_dom
: record_failure("unschedulable graph");
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work @danielogh ! Looks reasonable :)
Thanks for the reviews! |
/integrate |
@danielogh |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 480b508.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@vnkozlov @danielogh Pushed as commit 480b508. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This patch associates product bailouts with a few existing debug asserts. The criteria are that there have been product bugs associated with failing these asserts in the past, and that there are not too many callers to the method where the compilation is now cancelled or any measurable impact on compilation time.
Testing: T1-T4 and extra testing. Tested compilation time with -XX:+CITime on performance benchmarks and the effect was not measurable.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22482/head:pull/22482
$ git checkout pull/22482
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22482
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22482/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22482
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22482
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22482.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment