-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8343001: Adjust XSLT and XPath Extension Function Property #22504
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back joehw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@JoeWang-Java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 41 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@JoeWang-Java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
LanceAndersen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall Looks good Joe
please see the comment below
| * @param expectedResult Expected transformation result | ||
| **/ | ||
| @Test(dataProvider = "document") | ||
| //@Test(dataProvider = "document") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason you have this commented out? If the test is not needed, it should be removed or use the 'disable' element and add a comment as to why this is disabled
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch - it was commented out for debugging the other tests.
|
|
||
| {BasisLibrary.UNALLOWED_EXTENSION_ELEMENT_ERR, | ||
| "Use of the extension element ''{0}'' is not allowed when the secure processing feature is set to true."}, | ||
| "Use of the extension function ''{0}'' is not allowed when extension " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it correct that "element" has been replaced by "function" here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"element" it is. Fixed.
| * <p>State of secure processing feature.</p> | ||
| */ | ||
| private boolean _isNotSecureProcessing = true; | ||
| private boolean _isNotSecureProcessing = false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An unfortunate double-negative state for the feature.
(Makes it hard to understand and easy to get confused about).
| public static boolean isWindows = false; | ||
| static { | ||
| if (System.getProperty("os.name").contains("Windows")) { | ||
| isWindows = true; | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be a direct assignment and final:
| public static boolean isWindows = false; | |
| static { | |
| if (System.getProperty("os.name").contains("Windows")) { | |
| isWindows = true; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| public static final boolean isWindows = System.getProperty("os.name").contains("Windows"); |
RogerRiggs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the updates
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 7ec36bb.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@JoeWang-Java Pushed as commit 7ec36bb. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Disables XSLT and XPath Extension Functions by default, setting jdk.xml.enableExtensionFunctions to false.
Adjusted tests accordingly.
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22504/head:pull/22504$ git checkout pull/22504Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22504$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22504/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22504View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22504Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22504.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment