-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8345589: Simplify Windows definition of strtok_r #22597
Conversation
👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks
// *not* the same as the C99 Annex K strtok_s. VS provides that function | ||
// under the name strtok_s_l. Make strtok_r a synonym so we can use that name | ||
// in shared code. | ||
const auto strtok_r = strtok_s; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just 1 question, is strtok_r in this VC definition a function pointer? I don't think I've ever seen code do this before. Also, I think Annex K is C11, not C99
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This moves it to a place inaccessible to my port, but it's a small change and I can handle it rather easily, so I'm ok with this.
Mailing list message from Kim Barrett on hotspot-dev: On 12/6/24 3:10 AM, Julian Waters wrote:
I suspected that might happen.? But this new location seems like a I'm assuming you're going to have some non-trivial rearrangement of
Yes.
Oops. I thought I had C99 open when I was looking at Annex K. |
Thanks for reviews @dholmes-ora and @TheShermanTanker |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit e821d59.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@kimbarrett Pushed as commit e821d59. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please review this change to move the Windows-specific definition of strtok_r
to globalDefinitions_visCPP.hpp. In addition, the unused S_ISCHR macro is
removed and the S_ISFIFO macro is also moved.
Testing: mach5 tier1
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22597/head:pull/22597
$ git checkout pull/22597
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22597
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22597/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22597
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22597
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22597.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment