Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8346160: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings from explicit casts #22740

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kimbarrett
Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett commented Dec 13, 2024

Please review this change that removes -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant
warnings from explicit casts of a literal 0 to a pointer type. Different
versions of gcc seem to warn about different cases changed here, but all of
these showed up as a warning in some testing, whether Oracle CI, GHA sanity
tests, or local cross-builds using Oracle's devkits for that.

Some of the changes simply replace a cast of 0 with nullptr.

The UNIX_PATH_MAX macro definitions in attachListener_{aix,posix}.cpp is
changed to use a C++11 feature for obtaining the size of a non-static data
member without requiring an instance.
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2253.html
I guess I need to propose an update to the style guide to mention this feature.

In CompressedKlassPointers::initialize, casting
CompressedClassSpaceBaseAddress to a pointer type was triggering the warning
in release builds for some reason. That's not a literal 0, even though it is
a constant 0 in a release build. Changed to avoid that cast rather than trying
to argue with some versions of the compiler.

Although different gcc versions on different platforms seemed to vary whether
warning about each of these, this actually seems to be all of the explict
casts of a literal 0 to a pointer in HotSpot. Though because of the varied
behaviors, new ones might slip in later.

Testing: mach5 tier1, GHA sanity tests, both with and without the warning enabled.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8346160: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings from explicit casts (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22740/head:pull/22740
$ git checkout pull/22740

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22740
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22740/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22740

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22740

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22740.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 13, 2024

👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8346160: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings from explicit casts

Reviewed-by: stefank, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 13, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 13, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That all seem fine. Thanks

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

Thanks for reviews @stefank and @dholmes-ora

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Going to push as commit c88e081.
Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 16, 2024

@kimbarrett Pushed as commit c88e081.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@kimbarrett kimbarrett deleted the fix-cast-zero-null branch December 16, 2024 04:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants