Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8337016: serviceability/jvmti/RedefineClasses/RedefineLeakThrowable.java gets Metaspace OOM #22746

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Dec 13, 2024

This increases MaxMetaspaceSize for this test so that it can be run with CDS turned off. This change is upstreamed from the valhalla repo from when it didn't have CDS on. The test still finds a metaspace leak with this larger MaxMetaspaceSize.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8337016: serviceability/jvmti/RedefineClasses/RedefineLeakThrowable.java gets Metaspace OOM (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22746/head:pull/22746
$ git checkout pull/22746

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22746
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22746/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22746

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22746

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22746.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 13, 2024

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8337016: serviceability/jvmti/RedefineClasses/RedefineLeakThrowable.java gets Metaspace OOM

Reviewed-by: dholmes, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 30 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 13, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 13, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Webrevs

…neLeakThrowable.java

Co-authored-by: David Holmes <62092539+dholmes-ora@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 16, 2024
@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Dec 17, 2024

Thank you for reviewing, David and Serguei.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Going to push as commit fbd76ca.
Since your change was applied there have been 39 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • baeb3d9: 8346304: SA doesn't need a copy of getModifierFlags
  • 99af595: 8345942: Separate source output from class output when building microbenchmarks
  • 8a64595: 8346282: [JVMCI] Add failure reason support to UnresolvedJava/Type/Method/Field
  • 725079b: 8345506: jar --validate may lead to java.nio.file.FileAlreadyExistsException
  • 5e25c48: 8346289: Confusing phrasing in IR Framework README / User-defined Regexes
  • fbbc7c3: 8346120: VirtualThreadPinned event recorded for Object.wait may have wrong duration or may record second event
  • 466c00a: 8346234: javax/swing/text/DefaultEditorKit/4278839/bug4278839.java still fails in CI
  • bd3c0be: 8268611: jar --validate should check targeted classes in MR-JAR files
  • 87804f2: 8346294: Invalid lint category specified in compiler.properties
  • 18d1d61: 8346046: Enable copyright header format check
  • ... and 29 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e7fc0eb522f14ee28ac40cf89268767cb7b6dfcf...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 17, 2024

@coleenp Pushed as commit fbd76ca.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@coleenp coleenp deleted the metaleak branch December 17, 2024 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants