-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8346475: RISC-V: Small improvement for MacroAssembler::ctzc_bit #22800
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back fyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@RealFYang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@RealFYang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
Hamlin-Li
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Thanks!
Hamlin-Li
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, just realize this.
Hamlin-Li
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another comment.
feilongjiang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks!
Hamlin-Li
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks for updating!
|
@Hamlin-Li @feilongjiang : Thanks for the review! Tier1-2 test is still clean with the latest version. Moving on. |
|
Going to push as commit 6b89954.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@RealFYang Pushed as commit 6b89954. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi, please review this small improvement.
When
stepis 16, theandiinstruction in the loop performs a bitwise AND with immediate mask value 0xFFFF. This will emit 3 instructions. It's effectively a zero extension operation and could be reduced to 1 or 2 instructions repectively depending on whether Zbb extension is available. And there is no difference whenstepis 8 with this change.Testing: tier1 and gtest:all are clean on Premier-P550 SBC running Ubuntu-24.04.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22800/head:pull/22800$ git checkout pull/22800Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22800$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22800/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22800View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22800Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22800.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment