-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8347147: [REDO] AccessFlags can be u2 in metadata #22968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
/contributor add @offamitkumar |
|
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 7 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@coleenp |
|
@coleenp The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
|
PR for original review here: #22246 |
9b2abf9 to
7141918
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed.
|
@coleenp Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
|
Thank you for the re-review Vladimir and Yudi. |
|
Going to push as commit 6ee2bd2.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This is the same change that I pushed as commit 098afc8 but now coordinated with @mur47x111 for the graal changes.
A tier1 sanity test complete.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Contributors
<amitkumar@openjdk.org>Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22968/head:pull/22968$ git checkout pull/22968Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22968$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22968/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22968View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22968Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22968.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment