8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller

[pchilano]

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit ea495377 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Patricio Chilano Mateo on 8 Jan 2025 and was reviewed by David Holmes, Alex Menkov and Serguei Spitsyn.

Thanks!

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

• Serguei Spitsyn (@sspitsyn - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23007/head:pull/23007
$ git checkout pull/23007

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23007
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23007/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23007

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23007

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23007.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back pchilanomate! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk24 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@pchilano This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310340: assert(_thread->is_interp_only_mode() || stub_caller) failed: expected a stub-caller

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the jdk24 branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk24 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@pchilano The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (ed105abe)

[sspitsyn]

This is a clean backport. Looks good.

[pchilano]

Thanks Serguei!
/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit f0a89c5.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the jdk24 branch:

• c61fbfd: 8345337: JFR: jfr view should display all direct subfields for an event type
• 92a4e23: 8346838: RISC-V: runtime/CommandLine/OptionsValidation/TestOptionsWithRanges.java crash with debug VMs
• ba36d30: 8332506: SIGFPE In ObjectSynchronizer::is_async_deflation_needed()
• 41630c5: 8347127: CTW fails to build after JDK-8334733
• 864d0fd: 8347289: HKDF delayed provider selection failed with non-extractable PRK
• ff9b8e4: 8346737: GenShen: Generational memory pools should not report zero for maximum capacity

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@pchilano Pushed as commit f0a89c5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.