-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8347146: Convert IncludeLocalesPluginTest to use JUnit #23016
8347146: Convert IncludeLocalesPluginTest to use JUnit #23016
Conversation
👋 Welcome back naoto! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@naotoj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 106 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looked through the changes and the swap to a JUnit ParameterizedTest looks good to me.
@@ -424,47 +414,43 @@ public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { | |||
|
|||
helper = Helper.newHelper(isLinkableRuntime); | |||
if (helper == null) { | |||
throw new RuntimeException("Helper could not be initialized"); | |||
fail("Helper could not be initialized"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be assertNotNull
, but probably best to not use an assertion in the setup method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replaced with assertion here, and one other location. I think it is fine
Thanks for the reviews! |
Going to push as commit 06ff4c1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
A simple refinement to the test makes diagnosing failures easier.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23016/head:pull/23016
$ git checkout pull/23016
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23016
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23016/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23016
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23016
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23016.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment