-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8347613: Remove leftover doPrivileged call in Currency test: CheckDataVersion.java #23087
8347613: Remove leftover doPrivileged call in Currency test: CheckDataVersion.java #23087
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 121 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
} catch (IOException ioe) { | ||
throw new RuntimeException(ioe); | ||
throw new RuntimeException( | ||
"CheckDataVersion was not set up properly: " + ioe); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IOException could happen not by the test setup failure, but for the case the currency.data
file in the JDK is missing or corrupt, so if you want to give extra message to the exception, needs some rewording. Also, I prefer ioe
should be the cause
and not to be consumed in the message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I meant that if currency.data was missing/corrupted, it was a set up failure because we can not test the contents properly. Although, I suppose that just means the test fails, not fails to setup properly. Updated the message to be more clear, and also used the 2 arg ctor to retain the IOE as you suggested.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 02d2493.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit 02d2493. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please review this PR which removes a leftover
doPrivileged
call in the Currency test, CheckDataVersion.java.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23087/head:pull/23087
$ git checkout pull/23087
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23087
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23087/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23087
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23087
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23087.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment