-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 #23339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 #23339
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine, but I have a minor suggestion:
|
||
/* Only add DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread if it is actually present in the type database. */ | ||
try { | ||
db.lookupType("DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see there is public Type lookupType(String cTypeName, boolean throwException);
, so this might be more accurately, without over-catching the exceptions:
if (db.lookupType("DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread", false) != null) {
virtualConstructor.addMapping("DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread", DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread.class);
}
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea. I've updated to do that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes looks good.
Thanks Aleksey, Kevin, and Leonid. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 98a93e1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@plummercj Pushed as commit 98a93e1. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread was being unconditionally added to the mapping table:
But is conditionally included in VMStructs:
There is code that iterates over all the mapping table entries and calls db.lookupType() on each. This results in a RuntimeException if the type is not present in the type database:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No type named "DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread" in database
The fix is to not add it to the mapping table if it is not present in the database.
Testing is in progresses. I did test locally with a debug build using TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:+DeoptimizeObjectsALot to make sure the original DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread issue is still fixed, and then tested a release build without TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:+DeoptimizeObjectsALot to make sure this new issue did not reproduce.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23339/head:pull/23339
$ git checkout pull/23339
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23339
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23339/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23339
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23339
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23339.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment