Skip to content

Conversation

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn commented Feb 3, 2025

Non-java threads were not having their gc-state configured when they attach. Additionally, we need to hold the Threads_lock when concurrently changing the gc state to make sure that any stale gc state observed when the thread attaches is fixed by the handshake when the thread list is iterated.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8348268: Test gc/shenandoah/TestResizeTLAB.java#compact: fatal error: Before Updating References: Thread C2 CompilerThread1: expected gc-state 9, actual 21 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23428/head:pull/23428
$ git checkout pull/23428

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23428
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23428/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23428

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23428

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23428.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 3, 2025

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 3, 2025

@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8348268: Test gc/shenandoah/TestResizeTLAB.java#compact: fatal error: Before Updating References: Thread C2 CompilerThread1: expected gc-state 9, actual 21

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 91 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e7157d1: 8150442: Enforce Supported Platforms in Packager for MSI bundles
  • 6428165: 8349254: Disable "best-fit" mapping on Windows environment variables
  • 32dc41c: 8349624: Validation for slot missing in CodeBuilder local variable instructions
  • a1bcda2: 8349579: jsvml.dll incorrect RDATA SEGMENT specification
  • ee079fd: 8349820: Temporarily increase MemLimit for tests until JDK-8349772 and JDK-8337821 are fixed
  • 545d19f: 8349771: Replace usages of -mx and -ms in some monitor tests
  • 5ee44c1: 8349662: SSLTube SSLSubscriptionWrapper has potential races when switching subscriptions
  • 964dd18: 8349515: [REDO] Framework for tracing makefile inclusion and parsing
  • 8e85829: 8349213: G1: Clearing bitmaps during collection set merging not claimed by region
  • 1a8212e: 8348678: [PPC64] C2: unaligned vector load/store is ok
  • ... and 81 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/618c5eb27b4c719afd577b690e6bcb21a45fcb0d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 3, 2025

@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 3, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Webrevs

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

shipilev commented Feb 4, 2025

It looks generally okay, but I am confused how this fixes a bad state in C2 CompilerThread1, since compiler threads are Java threads?

class CompilerThread : public JavaThread {

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shipilev , that is a good point. Will take a closer look.

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great find.

So that means we cannot safely do ShenandoahHeap::set_gc_state_concurrent, unless we hold Threads_lock and do a handshake afterwards? I think a part of comment that you have near MutexLocker can go to ShenandoahHeap::set_gc_state_concurrent with the assert(Threads_lock->is_locked(), ....

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's right. The on_thread_attach callback and the thread being added to the list of threads does happen under the Thread_lock, by the handshake mechanism (and the java thread iterator) do not take the thread lock. In this particular assertion violation, the thread received a stale gc_state when it attached (before the control thread even entered concurrent_prepare_for_update_refs), however, the control thread executed the handshake before the recently attached thread was actually added to the java thread list.

I will update the comment and add an assert in set_gc_state_concurrent.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 11, 2025
@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Going to push as commit 8c09d40.
Since your change was applied there have been 91 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e7157d1: 8150442: Enforce Supported Platforms in Packager for MSI bundles
  • 6428165: 8349254: Disable "best-fit" mapping on Windows environment variables
  • 32dc41c: 8349624: Validation for slot missing in CodeBuilder local variable instructions
  • a1bcda2: 8349579: jsvml.dll incorrect RDATA SEGMENT specification
  • ee079fd: 8349820: Temporarily increase MemLimit for tests until JDK-8349772 and JDK-8337821 are fixed
  • 545d19f: 8349771: Replace usages of -mx and -ms in some monitor tests
  • 5ee44c1: 8349662: SSLTube SSLSubscriptionWrapper has potential races when switching subscriptions
  • 964dd18: 8349515: [REDO] Framework for tracing makefile inclusion and parsing
  • 8e85829: 8349213: G1: Clearing bitmaps during collection set merging not claimed by region
  • 1a8212e: 8348678: [PPC64] C2: unaligned vector load/store is ok
  • ... and 81 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/618c5eb27b4c719afd577b690e6bcb21a45fcb0d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2025

@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 8c09d40.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants