Skip to content

8349358: [JMH] Cannot access class jdk.internal.vm.ContinuationScope #23437

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Feb 4, 2025

Hi all,

Several JMH tests fails "cannot access class jdk.internal.vm.ContinuationScope (in module java.base) because module java.base does not export jdk.internal.vm to unnamed module". This PR add VM option --add-exports=java.base/jdk.internal.vm=ALL-UNNAMED to fix the JMH test bug.

Change has been verified locally, test-fix only, no risk.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8349358: [JMH] Cannot access class jdk.internal.vm.ContinuationScope (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23437/head:pull/23437
$ git checkout pull/23437

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23437
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23437/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23437

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23437

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23437.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 4, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2025

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8349358: [JMH] Cannot access class jdk.internal.vm.ContinuationScope

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 364 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e82031e: 8350756: C2 SuperWord Multiversioning: remove useless slow loop when the fast loop disappears
  • 3626ac3: 8204868: java/util/zip/ZipFile/TestCleaner.java still fails with "cleaner failed to clean zipfile."
  • 4bb3d81: 8351138: Running subset of gtests gets error printing result information
  • 107ee87: 8346954: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.MaskedLogicOpts fails due to IndexOutOfBoundsException
  • 11a37c8: 8351165: Remove unused includes from vmStructs
  • c3b4819: 8351074: Disallow null prefix and suffix in DecimalFormat
  • 6012e8d: 8350808: Small typos in JShell method SnippetEvent.toString()
  • 661bd5b: 8343478: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (core-libs)
  • 61d9ab9: 8350854: Include thread counts in safepoint logging
  • ea9e3cf: 8281511: java/net/ipv6tests/UdpTest.java fails with checkTime failed
  • ... and 354 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/7ea176d79c126c69cea5631d6542cd42bd8b11d9...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2025

@sendaoYan To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

/label add core-libs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2025

@sendaoYan
The core-libs label was successfully added.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Webrevs

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

These are left over from early development, need to decide if they should be removed.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 4, 2025

@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Should we remove these JMH tests, or just fix the test bug and make tests run normally

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

Should we remove these JMH tests, or just fix the test bug and make tests run normally

I think that would be best as they are left over from early development.

…test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/loom/obsolete/OneShot.java test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/loom/obsolete/Oscillation.java
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Should we remove these JMH tests, or just fix the test bug and make tests run normally

I think that would be best as they are left over from early development.

The related test files has been removed in this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 6, 2025
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @AlanBateman

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Going to push as commit 5c552a9.
Since your change was applied there have been 364 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e82031e: 8350756: C2 SuperWord Multiversioning: remove useless slow loop when the fast loop disappears
  • 3626ac3: 8204868: java/util/zip/ZipFile/TestCleaner.java still fails with "cleaner failed to clean zipfile."
  • 4bb3d81: 8351138: Running subset of gtests gets error printing result information
  • 107ee87: 8346954: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.MaskedLogicOpts fails due to IndexOutOfBoundsException
  • 11a37c8: 8351165: Remove unused includes from vmStructs
  • c3b4819: 8351074: Disallow null prefix and suffix in DecimalFormat
  • 6012e8d: 8350808: Small typos in JShell method SnippetEvent.toString()
  • 661bd5b: 8343478: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (core-libs)
  • 61d9ab9: 8350854: Include thread counts in safepoint logging
  • ea9e3cf: 8281511: java/net/ipv6tests/UdpTest.java fails with checkTime failed
  • ... and 354 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/7ea176d79c126c69cea5631d6542cd42bd8b11d9...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 6, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 6, 2025

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 5c552a9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@sendaoYan sendaoYan deleted the jbs8349358 branch March 6, 2025 07:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants