-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8349094: GenShen: Race between control and regulator threads may violate assertions #23475
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8349094: GenShen: Race between control and regulator threads may violate assertions #23475
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 33 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
|
/integrate delegate |
|
@earthling-amzn Integration of this pull request has been delegated and may be completed by any project committer using the /integrate pull request command. |
kdnilsen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you. This looks very clean to me.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahGenerationalControlThread.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ysramakrishna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Flushing the comments at EOD; will complete review later.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahGenerationalControlThread.hpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/heuristics/shenandoahOldHeuristics.hpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahGenerationalControlThread.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| ShenandoahGenerationType generation = GLOBAL; | ||
|
|
||
| uint age_period = 0; | ||
| const int64_t wait_ms = ShenandoahPacing ? ShenandoahControlIntervalMin : 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we are supporting ShenandoahPacing with GenShenm(at least till we pull it in the future), but don't want to enable it by default, correct?
Added tag jdk-25+11 for changeset 0131c1b
ysramakrishna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few random comments, mostly on documentation, and a few assertion suggestions.
Rest looks good. Thanks for tightening up the code via your changes in this PR.
I don't think I should need to re-review any changes you make stemming from my (rally quite minor) comments.
Reviewed; 🚢
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahGenerationalControlThread.hpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahGenerationalControlThread.hpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
It may cause the thread to exit before it is requested to stop
ysramakrishna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚢
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 3a8a432.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 3a8a432. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There are several changes to the operation of Shenandoah's control threads here.
ShenandoahHeap::_cancelled_gcas aGCCause, instead of various member variables in the control thread.typeand the actual generation instanceTesting
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23475/head:pull/23475$ git checkout pull/23475Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23475$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23475/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23475View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23475Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23475.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment