Skip to content

Conversation

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj commented Feb 6, 2025

The SA JavaThreadFactory interface is no longer used, so it is being removed. I stumbled on it while looking at JavaThread related code. It looks like its original purpose is related to JavaThread subclasses at one point being platform dependent, as described in the following JavaThread.java comment:

/** This is an abstract class because there are certain OS- and
    CPU-specific operations (like the setting and getting of the last
    Java frame pointer) which need to be factored out. These
    operations are implemented by, for example,
    SolarisSPARCJavaThread, and the concrete subclasses are
    instantiated by the JavaThreadFactory in the Threads class. */

However, this is no longer the case, and this comment is being removed as part of JDK-8348347.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8349571: Remove JavaThreadFactory interface from SA (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23505/head:pull/23505
$ git checkout pull/23505

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23505
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23505/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23505

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23505

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23505.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 6, 2025

👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8349571: Remove JavaThreadFactory interface from SA

Reviewed-by: kevinw, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 178 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ba28119: 8348427: DeferredLintHandler API should use JCTree instead of DiagnosticPosition
  • c5ac3c4: 8249831: Test sun/security/mscapi/nonUniqueAliases/NonUniqueAliases.java is marked with @ignore
  • 336d0d8: 8349926: [BACKOUT] Support static JDK in libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c
  • 4b463ee: 8342103: C2 compiler support for Float16 type and associated scalar operations
  • 332d87c: 8349859: Support static JDK in libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c
  • 73e1780: 8349836: G1: Improve group prediction log message
  • ed17c55: 8349145: Make Class.getProtectionDomain() non-native
  • e700460: 8349813: Test behavior of limiting() on RS operators throwing exceptions
  • 08f4c1c: 8349781: make test TEST=gtest fails on WSL
  • bb41df4: 8349723: Problemlist jdp tests for macosx-x64
  • ... and 168 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/81032560f797dc18bd6a4a75b44c26925aabac5b...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8349571 8349571: Remove JavaThreadFactory interface from SA Feb 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 6, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 6, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, I see no other references.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the reviews Kevin and Serguei!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Going to push as commit 2a5d1da.
Since your change was applied there have been 179 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 74e458b: 8349684: Remove SA core file tests from problem list for macosx-x64
  • ba28119: 8348427: DeferredLintHandler API should use JCTree instead of DiagnosticPosition
  • c5ac3c4: 8249831: Test sun/security/mscapi/nonUniqueAliases/NonUniqueAliases.java is marked with @ignore
  • 336d0d8: 8349926: [BACKOUT] Support static JDK in libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c
  • 4b463ee: 8342103: C2 compiler support for Float16 type and associated scalar operations
  • 332d87c: 8349859: Support static JDK in libfontmanager/freetypeScaler.c
  • 73e1780: 8349836: G1: Improve group prediction log message
  • ed17c55: 8349145: Make Class.getProtectionDomain() non-native
  • e700460: 8349813: Test behavior of limiting() on RS operators throwing exceptions
  • 08f4c1c: 8349781: make test TEST=gtest fails on WSL
  • ... and 169 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/81032560f797dc18bd6a4a75b44c26925aabac5b...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2025

@plummercj Pushed as commit 2a5d1da.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants