Skip to content

8349623: [ASAN] Gtest os_linux.glibc_mallinfo_wrapper_vm fails #23510

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Feb 7, 2025

Hi all,

The glibc function mallinfo() do do not work with -fsanitize=adddress, maybe it's limitation or bug of address sanitizer . Should we disable the gtest 'os_linux.glibc_mallinfo_wrapper_vm' when configure and build with address sanitizer. The macro ADDRESS_SANITIZER will always pass to gcc/clang/microsoft compiler when enable address sanitizer. So this PR check the macro ADDRESS_SANITIZER to enable the test or not.

On the other hand, this test get malloc usage information by call os::Linux::get_mallinfo and check "total allocation values" greater than 2K before allocate the memort by malloc(2K). Call os::Linux::get_mallinfo should after malloc(2K).

Below code snippet can demonstrate the glibc function mallinfo() do do not work with -fsanitize=adddress.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <malloc.h>

int main() {
    struct mallinfo info;
    info = mallinfo();

    printf("%d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d\n", info.arena, info.ordblks, info.smblks, info.hblks, info.hblkhd, info.usmblks, info.fsmblks, info.uordblks, info.fordblks, info.keepcost);

    char* ptr = malloc(0x10000);
    info = mallinfo();

    printf("%d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d, %d\n", info.arena, info.ordblks, info.smblks, info.hblks, info.hblkhd, info.usmblks, info.fsmblks, info.uordblks, info.fordblks, info.keepcost);

    free(ptr);
    return 0;
}
  • Without -fsanitize=address, mallinfo() works normally.
gcc mallinfo.c && ./a.out
0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
135168, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 67248, 67920, 67920
  • With -fsanitize=address, mallinfo() works abnormally.
gcc -fsanitize=address mallinfo.c && ./a.out
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8349623: [ASAN] Gtest os_linux.glibc_mallinfo_wrapper_vm fails (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23510/head:pull/23510
$ git checkout pull/23510

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23510
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23510/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23510

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23510

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23510.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 7, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 7, 2025

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8349623: [ASAN] Gtest os_linux.glibc_mallinfo_wrapper_vm fails

Reviewed-by: stuefe

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 323 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7314efc: 8351377: Fix the ProblemList for com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean cpuLoad tests on AIX
  • 7c9a784: 8351223: Update localized resources in keytool and jarsigner
  • a23fb0a: 8348110: Update LCMS to 2.17
  • 0892913: 8351086: (fc) Make java/nio/channels/FileChannel/BlockDeviceSize.java test manual
  • 93f2260: 8351294: (fs) Minor verbiage correction for Files.createTemp{Directory,File}
  • 8f8a879: 8350939: Revisit Windows PDH buffer size calculation for OperatingSystemMXBean
  • cfab88b: 8351256: Improve printing of runtime call stub names in disassember output
  • 7a5acb9: 8343840: Rewrite the ObjectMonitor lists
  • 40f150d: 8330936: [ubsan] exclude function BilinearInterp and ShapeSINextSpan in libawt java2d from ubsan checks
  • 649ef77: 8323158: HotSpot Style Guide should specify more include ordering
  • ... and 313 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3989a199578fc1d91988cfdbb95f11dd6d4c7b81...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 7, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 7, 2025

@sendaoYan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 7, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 7, 2025

@sendaoYan This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

keep it open.

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

@tstuefe Hi, could you take look this PR.

Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 7, 2025
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @tstuefe

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Going to push as commit 155697f.
Since your change was applied there have been 324 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4066f33: 8350565: NMT: remaining memory flag/type to be replaced with memory tag
  • 7314efc: 8351377: Fix the ProblemList for com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean cpuLoad tests on AIX
  • 7c9a784: 8351223: Update localized resources in keytool and jarsigner
  • a23fb0a: 8348110: Update LCMS to 2.17
  • 0892913: 8351086: (fc) Make java/nio/channels/FileChannel/BlockDeviceSize.java test manual
  • 93f2260: 8351294: (fs) Minor verbiage correction for Files.createTemp{Directory,File}
  • 8f8a879: 8350939: Revisit Windows PDH buffer size calculation for OperatingSystemMXBean
  • cfab88b: 8351256: Improve printing of runtime call stub names in disassember output
  • 7a5acb9: 8343840: Rewrite the ObjectMonitor lists
  • 40f150d: 8330936: [ubsan] exclude function BilinearInterp and ShapeSINextSpan in libawt java2d from ubsan checks
  • ... and 314 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3989a199578fc1d91988cfdbb95f11dd6d4c7b81...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 7, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 7, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 7, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 7, 2025

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 155697f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@sendaoYan sendaoYan deleted the jbs8349623 branch March 7, 2025 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants