-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8350095: RISC-V: Refactor string_compare #23633
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@Hamlin-Li This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 64 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
|
Hi, there is a difference between LU and UL when calculating the difference [1]. The BTW: Seems more readable if we move the difference calcuation code to [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/c2_MacroAssembler_riscv.cpp#L1571 |
|
Thanks for catching and suggestion, I'll modify it accordingly. |
RealFYang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the update. A couple of comments remain.
RealFYang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mind several more tweaks? Looks good otherwise. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Latest version looks good to me. Thanks!
Thank you! |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit e470f47.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@Hamlin-Li Pushed as commit e470f47. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi,
Can you help to review this patch?
Currently,
string_comparecode is a bit complicated, main reasons include:This is not good for code reading and maintaining.
So, this patch does following refactoring:
I could do the following refactoring in another following pr, as in this pr I'm just moving code and removing code, it's easier to do it and review it. In particular the first one, as it needs to rewrite the existing code for UL/LU case.
generate_compare_long_string_different_encodingupwards tostring_compare_long_LU.SHORT_STRINGcase simpler.Thanks
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23633/head:pull/23633$ git checkout pull/23633Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23633$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23633/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23633View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23633Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23633.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment