-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8350614: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.VectorCommutativeOperSharingBenchmark fails #23761
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 49 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@sendaoYan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
The micro benchmark test, which this PR is fixing was introduced just yesterday through #22863. I'll remove the core-libs label from this PR and add hotspot-compiler, given the original change which introduced this test. |
|
/label add hotspot-compiler |
|
/label remove core-libs |
|
@jaikiran |
|
@jaikiran |
|
@cl4es made the change in JDK-8343345, so he should probably have a quick look at this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Yes, please use only jvmArgs in @Fork annotations. While the distinction between jvmArgs, -Prepend and -Append is subtle and somewhat arbitrary we opted (JDK-8342958 + JDK-8343345) to designate jvmArgs to be used in benchmark annotations to set benchmark-specific flags, reserving jvmArgsPrepend for use by make test or whatever benchmarking harness you might use to set up environment flags (such as the native library path), and leaving jvmArgsAppend for command line extras (specifying GC etc).
|
Thanks all for the reviews. /integrate |
|
Going to push as commit acc6f19.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@sendaoYan Pushed as commit acc6f19. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
The newly added JMH test jdk.incubator.vector.VectorCommutativeOperSharingBenchmark run fails "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: jdk/incubator/vector/Vector".
The
@Fork(jvmArgsPrepend = ..)in microbenchmarks should replaced as@Fork(jvmArgs = ..)after JDK-8343345. Change has been verified locally, test-fix only, no risk.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23761/head:pull/23761$ git checkout pull/23761Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23761$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23761/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23761View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23761Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23761.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment