Skip to content

8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024#23785

Closed
IvaVladimir wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
IvaVladimir:JDK-8350701
Closed

8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024#23785
IvaVladimir wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
IvaVladimir:JDK-8350701

Conversation

@IvaVladimir
Copy link

@IvaVladimir IvaVladimir commented Feb 25, 2025

The 'size' parameters was used instead of hardcoded constant to improve support for different sizes.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024 (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23785/head:pull/23785
$ git checkout pull/23785

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23785
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23785/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23785

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23785

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23785.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 25, 2025

👋 Welcome back vaivanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@IvaVladimir This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024

Reviewed-by: pminborg

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 45 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3ae80bf: 8349766: GenShen: Bad progress after degen does not always need full gc
  • 2fd7156: 8347426: Invalid value used for enum Cell in iTypeFlow::StateVector::meet_exception
  • 939815f: 8347040: C2: assert(!loop->_body.contains(in)) failed
  • 8323ddf: 8346659: SnippetTaglet should report an error if provided ambiguous links
  • 3c9d64e: 8350858: [IR Framework] Some tests failed on Cascade Lake
  • d6d9447: 8350786: Some java/lang jtreg tests miss requires vm.hasJFR
  • e80b76b: 8276995: Bug in jdk.jfr.event.gc.collection.TestSystemGC
  • 799ac52: 8314840: 3 gc/epsilon tests ignore external vm options
  • 63e0fc4: 8350841: ProblemList jdk/incubator/vector/Long256VectorTests.java
  • acc6f19: 8350614: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.VectorCommutativeOperSharingBenchmark fails
  • ... and 35 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/dea7a9f0d640e5234bafe2157aecd942c71d5de5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@minborg) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 25, 2025

@IvaVladimir The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 25, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@minborg minborg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. The results of the benchmarks would be comparable with older benchmarks.

@IvaVladimir IvaVladimir changed the title 8350701 test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size >1024 8350701 [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size >1024 Feb 27, 2025
@IvaVladimir IvaVladimir changed the title 8350701 [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size >1024 8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size >1024 Feb 27, 2025
@IvaVladimir IvaVladimir changed the title 8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size >1024 JDK-8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024 Feb 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024 8350701: [JMH] test foreign.AllocFromSliceTest failed with Exception for size>1024 Feb 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 27, 2025
@IvaVladimir
Copy link
Author

/integrate
Thanks for your review!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Feb 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2025

@IvaVladimir
Your change (at version b45da29) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@dwhite-intel
Copy link

looks good!

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Going to push as commit f1398ec.
Since your change was applied there have been 45 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3ae80bf: 8349766: GenShen: Bad progress after degen does not always need full gc
  • 2fd7156: 8347426: Invalid value used for enum Cell in iTypeFlow::StateVector::meet_exception
  • 939815f: 8347040: C2: assert(!loop->_body.contains(in)) failed
  • 8323ddf: 8346659: SnippetTaglet should report an error if provided ambiguous links
  • 3c9d64e: 8350858: [IR Framework] Some tests failed on Cascade Lake
  • d6d9447: 8350786: Some java/lang jtreg tests miss requires vm.hasJFR
  • e80b76b: 8276995: Bug in jdk.jfr.event.gc.collection.TestSystemGC
  • 799ac52: 8314840: 3 gc/epsilon tests ignore external vm options
  • 63e0fc4: 8350841: ProblemList jdk/incubator/vector/Long256VectorTests.java
  • acc6f19: 8350614: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.VectorCommutativeOperSharingBenchmark fails
  • ... and 35 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/dea7a9f0d640e5234bafe2157aecd942c71d5de5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Feb 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2025

@dwhite-intel @IvaVladimir Pushed as commit f1398ec.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants