Skip to content

Conversation

@kimbarrett
Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett commented Feb 26, 2025

Please review this trivial change to remove a use of literal zero as a null
pointer constant.

Testing: mach5 tier1
Locally tested (linux-x64) with -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant enabled to
verify the warnings associated with this code were removed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8350623: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings in nsk native test utilities (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23797/head:pull/23797
$ git checkout pull/23797

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23797
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23797/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23797

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23797

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23797.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 26, 2025

👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8350623: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings in nsk native test utilities

Reviewed-by: coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 62 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • db69ec9: 8344009: Improve compiler memory statistics
  • f47232a: 8350954: Fix repetitions of the word "the" in gc component comments
  • 30b0c60: 8350956: Fix repetitions of the word "the" in compiler component comments
  • 8b0468f: 8315488: Remove outdated and unused ciReplay support from SA
  • 4109c73: 8349523: Unused runtime calls to drem/frem should be removed
  • b054d24: 8350584: Check the usage of LOG_PLEASE
  • 717c499: 8351014: ProblemList the com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean cpuLoad tests on Windows
  • 3657e92: 8349637: Integer.numberOfLeadingZeros outputs incorrectly in certain cases
  • 93c8784: 8350716: [s390] intrinsify Thread.currentThread()
  • d48ddfe: 8350748: VectorAPI: Method "checkMaskFromIndexSize" should be force inlined
  • ... and 52 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/037e47112bdf2fa2324f7c58198f6d433f17d9fd...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 26, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 26, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good plus trivial.

thread->started = 1;
thread->status = thread->procedure(thread->context);
thread->finished = 1;
#ifdef windows
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lower case 'windows' ?? Not an issue for your change, but odd.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it's a bit odd. It's defined up at the top of the file, based on whether _WIN32 is defined. I've no
idea why _WIN32 isn't just used instead.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 3, 2025
@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

Thanks for reviewing @coleenp

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Going to push as commit 67dfdfa.
Since your change was applied there have been 63 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4a51c61: 8350567: NMT: update VMATree::register_mapping to copy the existing tag of the region
  • db69ec9: 8344009: Improve compiler memory statistics
  • f47232a: 8350954: Fix repetitions of the word "the" in gc component comments
  • 30b0c60: 8350956: Fix repetitions of the word "the" in compiler component comments
  • 8b0468f: 8315488: Remove outdated and unused ciReplay support from SA
  • 4109c73: 8349523: Unused runtime calls to drem/frem should be removed
  • b054d24: 8350584: Check the usage of LOG_PLEASE
  • 717c499: 8351014: ProblemList the com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean cpuLoad tests on Windows
  • 3657e92: 8349637: Integer.numberOfLeadingZeros outputs incorrectly in certain cases
  • 93c8784: 8350716: [s390] intrinsify Thread.currentThread()
  • ... and 53 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/037e47112bdf2fa2324f7c58198f6d433f17d9fd...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2025

@kimbarrett Pushed as commit 67dfdfa.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants