-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8350940: RISC-V: remove unnecessary assert_different_registers in minmax_fp #23842
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@Hamlin-Li This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@Hamlin-Li this pull request can not be integrated into git checkout remove-unnecessary-reg-check
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
|
@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
|
Thank you! |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit e1fc14f.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@Hamlin-Li Pushed as commit e1fc14f. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi,
Can you help to review this simple change?
Seems to me it's not necessary to assert_different_registers between dst/src1/src2 in minmax_fp.
Thanks
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewers without OpenJDK IDs
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23842/head:pull/23842$ git checkout pull/23842Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23842$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23842/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23842View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23842Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23842.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment