-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
8351233: [ASAN] avx2-emu-funcs.hpp:151:20: error: ‘D.82188’ is used uninitialized #23925
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 305 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@sendaoYan To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command. Applicable Labels
|
@vamsi-parasa Could you take look this PR |
/label add core-libs |
@sendaoYan |
GHA report 1 test failure:
|
/label add hotspot-compiler |
@sendaoYan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. (I'll submit it for testing.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing results (hs-tier1 - hs-tier4) are clean.
GHA test failures are unrelated to this PR. Thanks for the reviews @iwanowww /integrate |
Going to push as commit 895aabc.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 895aabc. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
The return type of function
const __m256i &perm
is__m256i
, soconst __m256i &perm
should be replaced as 'const __m256i perm'.The function implementation in gcc/clang compiler header:
Additional testing:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23925/head:pull/23925
$ git checkout pull/23925
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23925
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23925/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23925
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23925
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23925.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment