Skip to content

Conversation

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran commented Apr 1, 2025

Can I please get a review of this test-only change which proposes to clean up some issues noticed in the TestRedirectLinks.java test?

The javadoc/doclet/testLinkOption/TestRedirectLinks.java test has been failing intermittently in our CI. The root cause of those failures isn't yet clear and those failures are being tracked in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338439.

While investigating those failures, it was noticed that this test had some issues that could be addressed separately to rule out their role in the intermittent failures.

The commit in this PR updates the test to using existing test library classes to construct the request URL as well as for constructing the SSLContext. The test is also updated to use the correct value to represent "no response body" when calling the sendResponseHeaders() method.

The test continues to pass with this change. We will continue investigating the intermittent failure if/when it occurs again after this change.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8338554: Fix inconsistencies in javadoc/doclet/testLinkOption/TestRedirectLinks.java (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24359/head:pull/24359
$ git checkout pull/24359

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24359
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24359/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24359

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24359

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24359.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back jpai! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2025

@jaikiran This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8338554: Fix inconsistencies in javadoc/doclet/testLinkOption/TestRedirectLinks.java

Reviewed-by: liach, nbenalla

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 74 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2025

@jaikiran The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Webrevs

+ x.getRequestURI());
String newProtocol = (newServer instanceof HttpsServer) ? "https" : "http";
String redirectTo = newProtocol + ":/" + newServer.getAddress() + x.getRequestURI();
String redirectTo = null;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
String redirectTo = null;
String redirectTo;

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

neat cleanup

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 2, 2025
Copy link
Member

@nizarbenalla nizarbenalla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that the use of InetSocketAddress::toString was dropped as it's not recommended when building URL strings.

Changes look good, thanks Jaikiran.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

jaikiran commented Apr 5, 2025

Thank you Chen and Nizar for the reviews.

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member Author

jaikiran commented Apr 5, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 5, 2025

Going to push as commit 9bb804b.
Since your change was applied there have been 78 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 5, 2025

@jaikiran Pushed as commit 9bb804b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jaikiran jaikiran deleted the 8338554 branch April 5, 2025 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants