Skip to content

Conversation

@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu commented Apr 4, 2025

Please review this PR which improves some Currency IllegalArgumentExceptions by including the input in the message. This could be a currency code, country code, or locale. This change also includes tests to check the messages for an invalid country via the region override as well as an invalid country code within a 3 length currency code.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8353713: Improve Currency.getInstance exception handling (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24459/head:pull/24459
$ git checkout pull/24459

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24459
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24459/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24459

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24459

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24459.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 4, 2025

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2025

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8353713: Improve Currency.getInstance exception handling

Reviewed-by: naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 27 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 867a030: 8352971: Increase maximum number of hold counts for ReentrantReadWriteLock
  • 9a391f4: 8353278: Consolidate local file URL checks in jar: and file: URL schemes
  • 4021033: 8353659: SubmissionPublisherTest::testCap1Submit times out
  • 60fbf73: 8353709: Debug symbols bundle should contain full debug files when building --with-external-symbols-in-bundles=public
  • 77fff61: 8341095: Possible overflow in os::Posix::print_uptime_info
  • 9128ec6: 8352935: Launcher should not add $JDK/../lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
  • 27c8d9d: 8352686: Opensource JInternalFrame tests - series3
  • 66435c2: 8352684: Opensource JInternalFrame tests - series1
  • 353e173: 8219408: Tests should handle ${} in the view of jtreg "smart action"
  • 26bb183: 8352621: MatchException from backwards incompatible change to switch expressions
  • ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3cc43b3224efdf1a3f35fff58b993027a9e1f4ad...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2025

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Apr 4, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

var badCode = "..A";
IllegalArgumentException ex = assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () ->
Currency.getInstance(badCode), "getInstance() did not throw IAE");
assertEquals("The country code: \"%s\" is not a valid ISO 3166 code"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the test is not parameterized, we can simply use ".." inside the expected string literal.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 7, 2025
@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Going to push as commit 5cac579.
Since your change was applied there have been 63 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2025

@justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit 5cac579.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants