-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8261231: Windows IME was disabled after DnD operation #2448
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dmarkov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@dmarkov20 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change looks good and i haven't found any side-effects during testing. Could you please add the label to the bug noting reason for absence of the regression test, like noreg-hard or something?
@dmarkov20 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
I also tested this fix. It worked fine. Thanks. |
Thank you for the review. I have added noreg-hard to the bug |
/integrate |
@dmarkov20 Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit d6d5d9b. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The function InvokeInputMethodFunction() is responsible for invocation of IME API. Typically it uses PostMessage() to execute corresponding IME function on the toolkit thread but if DnD operation takes place SendMessage() is used. The state of m_inputMethodWaitEvent event object remains signalled after SendMessage() execution. That causes failure of subsequent IME functions calls via PostMessage().
Fix:
SendMessage() and PostMessage() calls inside InvokeInputMethodFunction() should be synchronised. The state of m_inputMethodWaitEvent event object must be reseted right after SendMessage() execution.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2448/head:pull/2448
$ git checkout pull/2448