Skip to content

8352682: Opensource JComponent tests#24562

Closed
prsadhuk wants to merge 3 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
prsadhuk:JDK-8352682
Closed

8352682: Opensource JComponent tests#24562
prsadhuk wants to merge 3 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
prsadhuk:JDK-8352682

Conversation

@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Apr 10, 2025

Few JComponent tests are opensourced


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24562/head:pull/24562
$ git checkout pull/24562

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24562
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24562/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24562

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24562

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24562.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8352682: Opensource JComponent tests

Reviewed-by: jdv, honkar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 431 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@prsadhuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Webrevs

private static synchronized boolean failed() {
return !passFlag;
}
private static synchronized void fail() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these methods are a bit redundant, just add more code to read and understand. What about removing them and just renaming the flags failed and traced?
What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree traceFlag and passFlag are declared as volatile vars , so all four synchronized methods look redundant and can be removed to simplify the code.

These vars can be converted to CountDownLatch for stability.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. Redundant methods removed...utiliesed the vars..
CountDownLatch not needed as there's not indeterministic sleep in it, it is relying on flags which are deterministic in itself..

private static synchronized boolean failed() {
return !passFlag;
}
private static synchronized void fail() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree traceFlag and passFlag are declared as volatile vars , so all four synchronized methods look redundant and can be removed to simplify the code.

These vars can be converted to CountDownLatch for stability.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 15, 2025
@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Going to push as commit 55afcb5.
Since your change was applied there have been 435 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 16, 2025

@prsadhuk Pushed as commit 55afcb5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the JDK-8352682 branch April 16, 2025 04:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants