-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8223188: Removed unnecessary #ifdef __cplusplus from .cpp sources #2466
8223188: Removed unnecessary #ifdef __cplusplus from .cpp sources #2466
Conversation
👋 Welcome back asemenyuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@alexeysemenyukoracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@alexeysemenyukoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Bug Synopsis of 'Consider rewriting in C++ or moving to ".c" files' is unclear.
I would request that the Bug Synopsis to be changed to "removed unnecessary #ifdef __cplusplus" before integrating this PR.
e924131
to
bd1c3af
Compare
Bug Synopsis updated as suggested. |
@alexeysemenyukoracle FYI, there was no need to force-push (or even push at all) to your branch. It doesn't matter at all what the commit message(s) of the commit(s) in the source branch are. Skara will use the title of the PR, which needs to match the JBS bug, as the final commit message. |
Thank you! I was wondering how it picks up a message for squashed commit that goes in open jdk repo. Now I know. |
/integrate |
@alexeysemenyukoracle Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 699a3cd. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Remove needless
#ifdef __cplusplus
from .cpp sourcesProgress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2466/head:pull/2466
$ git checkout pull/2466