Skip to content

Conversation

@david-beaumont
Copy link
Contributor

@david-beaumont david-beaumont commented Apr 16, 2025

Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout factor in higher tiers.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8354424: java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock5.java fails intermittently in tier6 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24687/head:pull/24687
$ git checkout pull/24687

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24687
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24687/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24687

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24687

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24687.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 16, 2025

👋 Welcome back david-beaumont! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 16, 2025

@david-beaumont This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8354424: java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock5.java fails intermittently in tier6

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, smarks

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 171 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dfuch, @stuart-marks) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 16, 2025

@david-beaumont The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 16, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hard to tell whether 1s would be enough. I'd be tempted to bump that up.
You should also take the test out of the problem list.

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The proposed changes look good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@stuart-marks stuart-marks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable. This raises the base timeout by 4x. It also includes the timeout factor adjustment, which can be quite large (8x?) in higher tiers. I think at this point we just have to expose it to more runs to see whether it still fails too frequently.

@david-beaumont
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Apr 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@david-beaumont
Your change (at version 3a28b4f) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@dfuch
Copy link
Member

dfuch commented Apr 24, 2025

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Going to push as commit e01e33d.
Since your change was applied there have been 171 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Apr 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@dfuch @david-beaumont Pushed as commit e01e33d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@david-beaumont david-beaumont deleted the jdk_8354424 branch June 28, 2025 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants