Skip to content

Conversation

@Anjian-Wen
Copy link
Contributor

@Anjian-Wen Anjian-Wen commented Apr 17, 2025

support zvbb vand-not vector-scalar version, which Op1 is the sign-extended or truncated value in scalar register rs1
add C2 match rule
add related Tests in IRNode structure

passed jtreg test test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorapi/*


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8355074: RISC-V: C2: Support Vector-Scalar version of Zvbb Vector And-Not instruction (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24709/head:pull/24709
$ git checkout pull/24709

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24709
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24709/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24709

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24709

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24709.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back Anjian-Wen! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@Anjian-Wen This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355074: RISC-V: C2: Support Vector-Scalar version of Zvbb Vector And-Not instruction

Reviewed-by: fjiang, fyang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@feilongjiang, @RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@Anjian-Wen The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 18, 2025

@Anjian-Wen this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout Vector_And-Not_vx
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Apr 18, 2025
Support Zvbb Vector And-Not vx and add its tests
modify name of the match rule and test name
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Apr 18, 2025
@Anjian-Wen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/issue JDK-8355074

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title RISC-V: Support Zvbb Vector And-Not vx and add its tests 8355074: RISC-V: C2: Support Vector-Scalar version of Zvbb Vector And-Not instruction Apr 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 21, 2025

@Anjian-Wen The primary solved issue for a PR is set through the PR title. Since the current title does not contain an issue reference, it will now be updated.

@Anjian-Wen Anjian-Wen marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 05:54
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 24, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Webrevs

machOnlyNameRegex(VAND_NOT_L_MASKED, "vand_notL_masked");
}

public static final String VAND_NOTI_VX = PREFIX + "VAND_NOTI_VX" + POSTFIX;
Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang Apr 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a shared file and these four instructions are RISCV-specific, seems better to add a RISCV_ prefix to make that explicit. Consider names like RISCV_VAND_NOTI_VX, RISCV_VAND_NOTL_VX, RISCV_VAND_NOTI_VX_MASKED and RISCV_VAND_NOTL_VX_MASKED.

Copy link
Member

@feilongjiang feilongjiang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Overall looks good, with one minor suggestion.

// vector-immediate add (unpredicated)

instruct vadd_immI(vReg dst, vReg src1, immI5 con) %{
instruct vaddI_vi(vReg dst, vReg src1, immI5 con) %{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps we can do these naming refactorings in a separate PR first. This will look cleaner.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, that's a good idea, I'll split it into two patch

@Anjian-Wen
Copy link
Contributor Author

here is the another related pr for clean up
#24865

Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated change looks fine. Thanks.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 25, 2025
@Anjian-Wen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Apr 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 25, 2025

@Anjian-Wen
Your change (at version a99d32a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Going to push as commit 5c06723.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 25, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 25, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Apr 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 25, 2025

@RealFYang @Anjian-Wen Pushed as commit 5c06723.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@Anjian-Wen Anjian-Wen deleted the Vector_And-Not_vx branch April 27, 2025 06:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants