-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8354949: JFR: Split up the EventInstrumentation class #24726
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back egahlin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@egahlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 62 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
| private List<AnnotationValue> getAnnotationValues(ClassDesc classDesc) { | ||
| List<AnnotationValue> list = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
| for (Attribute<?> attribute: classModel.attributes()) { | ||
| if (attribute instanceof RuntimeVisibleAnnotationsAttribute rvaa) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
findAttribute or findAttributes can be helpful if you just want one attribute.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, but I like to refactor that in a later PR. That part of the code needs a complete rewrite.
liach
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ClassFile API usages look good.
|
Thanks for the reviews. /integrate |
|
Going to push as commit ef0cd18.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Could I have a review of a PR that cleans up the EventInstrumentation class and moves the non-modifying parts into a separate class (ClassInspector)?
I deleted the code that removes the instrumentation (buildUninstrumented), because it has never been used. If there should be a need for it in the future, it's not hard to add code that inserts empty method bodies.
Testing: tier1 + jdk/jdk/jfr/test
Thanks
Erik
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24726/head:pull/24726$ git checkout pull/24726Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24726$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24726/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24726View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24726Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24726.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment