-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8354484: SIGSEGV when supertype of an AOT-cached class is excluded #24780
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8354484: SIGSEGV when supertype of an AOT-cached class is excluded #24780
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
calvinccheung
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks reasonable.
|
Thanks @calvinccheung @shipilev for the review |
|
Going to push as commit e020752.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Since JDK-8353014, some classes that are loaded inside
LambdaFormInvokers::regenerate_holder_classes()are marked as "AOT tooling classes". These classes are excluded from the AOT configuration file (which is generated at the end of the training run).However, in the training run, application threads can run in parallel of
LambdaFormInvokers::regenerate_holder_classes()and could load a subtypeCof an "AOT tooling class"S.This bug happened because
Cis included in the AOT configuration file, butSis excluded.The fix in this PR -- for any
Cthat is included, we also include all of its super types, even for the super types that are marked as "AOT tooling classes".Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24780/head:pull/24780$ git checkout pull/24780Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24780$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24780/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24780View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24780Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24780.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment