8355648: Thread.SpinAcquire()'s lock name parameter is not used#24901
8355648: Thread.SpinAcquire()'s lock name parameter is not used#24901zhengyu123 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@zhengyu123 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks reasonable. Not trivial, though. I think the intent was to give the diagnostic messages when we are e.g. spinning too much? Does not seem to worth it for the spin-locks that are supposed to be very fast.
coleenp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is fine. There are only a couple of these locks left and it seems like we should be able to use some other locking mechanism already in the VM for these critical sections and remove this lock implementation that I want to forget still exists.
|
Going to push as commit 62ef706.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit 62ef706. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
|
I'm pretty sure the point of the name was to give something to inspect whilst debugging a hang. |
Please review this trivial change that removes unused lock name parameter.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24901/head:pull/24901$ git checkout pull/24901Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24901$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24901/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24901View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24901Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24901.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment