Skip to content

8355648: Thread.SpinAcquire()'s lock name parameter is not used#24901

Closed
zhengyu123 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
zhengyu123:JDK-8355648
Closed

8355648: Thread.SpinAcquire()'s lock name parameter is not used#24901
zhengyu123 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
zhengyu123:JDK-8355648

Conversation

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Apr 27, 2025

Please review this trivial change that removes unused lock name parameter.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8355648: Thread.SpinAcquire()'s lock name parameter is not used (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24901/head:pull/24901
$ git checkout pull/24901

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24901
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24901/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24901

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24901

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24901.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 27, 2025

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2025

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355648: Thread.SpinAcquire()'s lock name parameter is not used

Reviewed-by: shade, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2025

@zhengyu123 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 27, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 27, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable. Not trivial, though. I think the intent was to give the diagnostic messages when we are e.g. spinning too much? Does not seem to worth it for the spin-locks that are supposed to be very fast.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is fine. There are only a couple of these locks left and it seems like we should be able to use some other locking mechanism already in the VM for these critical sections and remove this lock implementation that I want to forget still exists.

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

Thanks, @shipilev and @coleenp

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Going to push as commit 62ef706.
Since your change was applied there have been 25 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2025

@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit 62ef706.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

I'm pretty sure the point of the name was to give something to inspect whilst debugging a hang.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants