-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8355472: Clean up x86 nativeInst after 32-bit x86 removal #24911
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back mhaessig! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@mhaessig This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 73 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@robcasloz, @shipilev, @TheShermanTanker) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Webrevs
|
robcasloz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks!
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! I have a tiny readability suggestion. Feel free to ignore it:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Shipilëv <shipilev@amazon.de>
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ship it.
|
Thank you for your reviews! /integrate |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 6a0c24f.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@robcasloz @mhaessig Pushed as commit 6a0c24f. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR cleans up code 32-bit x86 code in
nativeInst_x86.*files.Testing:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24911/head:pull/24911$ git checkout pull/24911Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24911$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24911/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24911View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24911Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24911.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment