Skip to content

Conversation

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn commented Apr 28, 2025

When old generation marking is cancelled to run a young collection. we still set a _degen_point for reasons that became vestigial after JDK-8349094. When old marking is cancelled, the _degen_point should only be set if the marking was cancelled because of an allocation failure (and it should still only be set to "outside of cycle"). The following sequence could lead to this assertion failure:

  1. Control thread is marking old
  2. Young GC preempts it
  3. Control thread sets the degen point because the old GC was "cancelled"
  4. The concurrent young GC fails and attempts to set a degenerated point
  5. This trips the assert because we already (incorrectly) set the degen point in 3.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8355789: GenShen: assert(_degen_point == ShenandoahGC::_degenerated_unset) failed: Should not be set yet: Outside of Cycle (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24940/head:pull/24940
$ git checkout pull/24940

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24940
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24940/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24940

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24940

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24940.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 28, 2025

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2025

@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355789: GenShen: assert(_degen_point == ShenandoahGC::_degenerated_unset) failed: Should not be set yet: Outside of Cycle

Reviewed-by: kdnilsen, ysr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 21 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2025

@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Apr 28, 2025
@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn changed the title GenShen: assert(_degen_point == ShenandoahGC::_degenerated_unset) failed: Should not be set yet: Outside of Cycle 8355789: GenShen: assert(_degen_point == ShenandoahGC::_degenerated_unset) failed: Should not be set yet: Outside of Cycle Apr 28, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 28, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@ysramakrishna ysramakrishna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine, but it also leaves me with the feeling that we should sit down and review the interaction of the state machines for the young and old collections with the mutator allocations, and see if we can simplify the interaction protocol.

🚢

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 29, 2025
@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Going to push as commit 5e27547.
Since your change was applied there have been 22 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 29, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 29, 2025

@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 5e27547.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn deleted the fix-degen-unset-assert branch October 7, 2025 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants