-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8355789: GenShen: assert(_degen_point == ShenandoahGC::_degenerated_unset) failed: Should not be set yet: Outside of Cycle #24940
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 21 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
ysramakrishna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks fine, but it also leaves me with the feeling that we should sit down and review the interaction of the state machines for the young and old collections with the mutator allocations, and see if we can simplify the interaction protocol.
🚢
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 5e27547.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 5e27547. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
When old generation marking is cancelled to run a young collection. we still set a
_degen_pointfor reasons that became vestigial after JDK-8349094. When old marking is cancelled, the_degen_pointshould only be set if the marking was cancelled because of an allocation failure (and it should still only be set to "outside of cycle"). The following sequence could lead to this assertion failure:3.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24940/head:pull/24940$ git checkout pull/24940Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24940$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24940/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24940View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24940Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24940.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment