-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8356057: PrintingProcessor (-Xprint) does not print type variable bounds and type annotations for Object supertypes #25002
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…nds and type annotations for Object supertypes
|
👋 Welcome back jlahoda! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@lahodaj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 166 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
vicente-romero-oracle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
| List<? extends TypeMirror> printableBounds = | ||
| tpe.getBounds() | ||
| .stream() | ||
| .filter(type -> !isUnimportantObjectType(type)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps the changes would be easier to ready if the method as "isImportantObjectType()"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, done under:
e78e88a
| if (!e2.getKind().isClass()) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| return e2.getSuperclass().getKind() != TypeKind.NONE; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be helpful to include some textual description of the intended semantics here including
"Omit the bound is unannotated java.lang.Object."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done:
9bb3677
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 24d77ad.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Consider code like:
when using
-Xprintto print this code, javac produces this:Note the type variable is missing the bound, and the annotated supertype is missing. This PR proposes to change that to:
Please also review the CSR:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356058
and the release note:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356062
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25002/head:pull/25002$ git checkout pull/25002Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25002$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25002/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25002View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25002Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25002.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment