Skip to content

Conversation

@dougxc
Copy link
Member

@dougxc dougxc commented May 8, 2025

By default, JVMCI and Graal initialization only occurs on the first top-tier (i.e. tier 4) JIT compilation request. This made sense prior to libgraal where the initialization was interpreted and so noticeably contributed to VM startup. However, with libgraal, the initialization is sufficiently fast to not impact startup.

The motivation for JVMCI and Graal eager initialization by default is to make Graal command line option processing happen in the same VM phase as handling of all other VM command line flags. That is, errors in Graal options should:

  1. Happen deterministically, not just for apps that run long enough to trigger a top tier JIT compilation. For example: java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+UseGraalJIT --version. In a JDK build that does not include Graal, this may succeed (and print out the version info) or result in a VM error ("Cannot use JVMCI compiler: No JVMCI compiler found").
  2. Stop the VM before any application code can be executed. This is just good hygiene.

This PR makes JVMCI initialization eager by default if UseJVMCICompiler is true.
This is done for both libgraal and jargraal so that the behavior is uniform. Since jargraal is now a development configuration, VM startup costs are not critical.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8356447: Change default for EagerJVMCI to true (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25121/head:pull/25121
$ git checkout pull/25121

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25121
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25121/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25121

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25121

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25121.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2025

@dougxc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8356447: Change default for EagerJVMCI to true

Reviewed-by: yzheng, kvn, never

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 213 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2025

@dougxc The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • graal
  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels May 8, 2025
@dougxc dougxc force-pushed the JDK-8356447 branch 3 times, most recently from 1c1b8d7 to eab659c Compare May 9, 2025 13:30
@dougxc dougxc marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2025 20:13
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 12, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 12, 2025

Webrevs

Comment on lines 89 to 91
if (FLAG_IS_DEFAULT(EagerJVMCI) && !EagerJVMCI) {
FLAG_SET_DEFAULT(EagerJVMCI, true);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The default value is false - I don't think you need check it.
You can use FLAG_SET_ERGO_IF_DEFAULT(EagerJVMCI, true);

Copy link
Contributor

@mur47x111 mur47x111 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor

@dougxc please remind me. Is it true that with current libgraal no Java code is executed when it is initialized? Or you still have calls into core library?

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 13, 2025
@dougxc
Copy link
Member Author

dougxc commented May 13, 2025

@dougxc please remind me. Is it true that with current libgraal no Java code is executed when it is initialized? Or you still have calls into core library?

There are still some calls to CompilerToVM.lookupType during libgraal initialization but I think all the types it looks up will already be resolved so will not require Java code execution.

@dougxc
Copy link
Member Author

dougxc commented May 13, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 13, 2025

Going to push as commit 08b2df8.
Since your change was applied there have been 213 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 13, 2025

@dougxc Pushed as commit 08b2df8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants