Skip to content

8356555: Incorrect use of {@link} in BigDecimal#25131

Closed
jddarcy wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jddarcy:JDK-8356555
Closed

8356555: Incorrect use of {@link} in BigDecimal#25131
jddarcy wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jddarcy:JDK-8356555

Conversation

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member

@jddarcy jddarcy commented May 8, 2025

Fix javadoc tags.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8356555: Incorrect use of {@link} in BigDecimal (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25131/head:pull/25131
$ git checkout pull/25131

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25131
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25131/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25131

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25131

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25131.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back darcy! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2025

@jddarcy This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8356555: Incorrect use of {@link} in BigDecimal

Reviewed-by: bpb, nbenalla, liach, iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8356555: Incorrect use of {@link} in BigDecimal 8356555: Incorrect use of {@link} in BigDecimal May 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2025

@jddarcy The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label May 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 8, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

Copy link
Member

@nizarbenalla nizarbenalla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks good.

Copy link
Member

@nizarbenalla nizarbenalla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just noticed there are a couple more javadoc tags that need to be fixed in this class, I still see two more warnings. I should have included these in the JBS issue when filling it.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/math/BigDecimal.java:363: warning: reference to non-visible type: BigDecimal.scale (use -protected or -private options to document non-public types)
     * The scale of this BigDecimal, as returned by {@link #scale}.
                                                    ^
src/java.base/share/classes/java/math/BigDecimal.java:366: warning: reference to non-visible type: BigDecimal.scale (use -protected or -private options to document non-public types)
     * @see #scale
       ^
       ```

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member Author

jddarcy commented May 9, 2025

I just noticed there are a couple more javadoc tags that need to be fixed in this class, I still see two more warnings. I should have included these in the JBS issue when filling it.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/math/BigDecimal.java:363: warning: reference to non-visible type: BigDecimal.scale (use -protected or -private options to document non-public types)
     * The scale of this BigDecimal, as returned by {@link #scale}.
                                                    ^
src/java.base/share/classes/java/math/BigDecimal.java:366: warning: reference to non-visible type: BigDecimal.scale (use -protected or -private options to document non-public types)
     * @see #scale
       ^
       ```

Okay; I'll add a fix for that, although the javadoc text is one a private field so is not generated by default.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@nizarbenalla nizarbenalla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 9, 2025
@jddarcy
Copy link
Member Author

jddarcy commented May 9, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 9, 2025

Going to push as commit bed29a0.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 9, 2025

@jddarcy Pushed as commit bed29a0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants