Skip to content

Conversation

@mur47x111
Copy link
Contributor

@mur47x111 mur47x111 commented May 21, 2025

Hosted Truffle compilations are installed on the OptimizedCallTarget#profiledPERoot method. Any deoptimization contributes to its decompile count, which can easily exceed the PerMethodRecompilationCutoff threshold, permanently preventing highest tier compilation on this method. This PR exempts hosted compilations from this cutoff by ensuring their decompile count is not incremented for hosted compiled nmethods.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8357424: [JVMCI] Avoid incrementing decompilation count for hosted compiled nmethod (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25356/head:pull/25356
$ git checkout pull/25356

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25356
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25356/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25356

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25356

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25356.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 21, 2025

👋 Welcome back yzheng! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 21, 2025

@mur47x111 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8357424: [JVMCI] Avoid incrementing decompilation count for hosted compiled nmethod

Reviewed-by: dnsimon, never, cslucas

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 21, 2025

@mur47x111 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • graal
  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org labels May 21, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 21, 2025

Copy link
Member

@dougxc dougxc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 22, 2025
@tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

I think there are two levels of counters that we might want to disable. We definitely want to stop deopts and recompilations from marking the method not compilable which the current change does. Additionally JVMCIRuntime::register_method will perform this logic if validate_compile_task_dependencies fails and I don't think we want that. I think the new !is_default guard idiom should be in a helper like nmethod::is_jvmci_hosted. Do we use the hosted language elsewhere?

The second level is to stop all counter updates in hosted compiles, for similar reasons. Those updates won't lead to disabling compilation but they will quickly lead to saturating of all the counters which is fairly pointless but probably benign. This would be done by setting update_trap_state to false for hosted nmethods. That also has the effect of keeping inc_recompile_count false. I think that's the right thing to do but I'd want to make sure that we test truffle workloads with those changes before making that change to make sure there isn't some subtle problem with that change.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 11, 2025
@mur47x111
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tkrodriguez by stop all counter updates in hosted compiles you mean the trap-related counters, right?

@tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

Yes. Any update to the MDO for hosted compiles doesn't seem useful I think.

Added tag jdk-26+2 for changeset d7aa349
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tkrodriguez tkrodriguez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great.

Copy link
Contributor

@JohnTortugo JohnTortugo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks.

@mur47x111
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review! Passed Tier1-3
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Going to push as commit ea86a20.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@mur47x111 Pushed as commit ea86a20.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants