8261652: Remove some dead comments from os_bsd_x86

[VladimirKempik]

This removes some dead comments form bsd_x86 and double include of pthread.h

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8261652: Remove some dead comments from os_bsd_x86

Reviewers

• Daniel D. Daugherty (@dcubed-ojdk - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2547/head:pull/2547
$ git checkout pull/2547

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back vkempik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@VladimirKempik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (b4983bd)

[dcubed-ojdk]

Thumbs up.

[openjdk]

@VladimirKempik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8261652: Remove some dead comments from os_bsd_x86

Reviewed-by: dcubed

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6675775: 8253702: BigSur version number reported as 10.16, should be 11.nn
• 33fcd32: 8261659: JDK-8261027 causes a Tier1 validate-source failure
• 3aa1b4c: 8261623: reference to javac internals in Extern class
• 350303d: 8260221: java.util.Formatter throws wrong exception for mismatched flags in %% conversion
• 6475d47: 8261655: [PPC64] Build broken after JDK-8260941
• c0e805a: 8261654: Missing license header in Signatures.java
• b670efd: 8261072: AArch64: Fix MacroAssembler::get_thread convention
• 59b8d59: 8261481: Cannot read Kerberos settings in dynamic store on macOS Big Sur
• 9f81ca8: 8261230: GC tracing of page sizes are wrong in a few places

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[VladimirKempik]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@VladimirKempik Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6675775: 8253702: BigSur version number reported as 10.16, should be 11.nn
• 33fcd32: 8261659: JDK-8261027 causes a Tier1 validate-source failure
• 3aa1b4c: 8261623: reference to javac internals in Extern class
• 350303d: 8260221: java.util.Formatter throws wrong exception for mismatched flags in %% conversion
• 6475d47: 8261655: [PPC64] Build broken after JDK-8260941
• c0e805a: 8261654: Missing license header in Signatures.java
• b670efd: 8261072: AArch64: Fix MacroAssembler::get_thread convention
• 59b8d59: 8261481: Cannot read Kerberos settings in dynamic store on macOS Big Sur
• 9f81ca8: 8261230: GC tracing of page sizes are wrong in a few places

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 28163a9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.