Skip to content

8358178: Some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without#25557

Closed
plummercj wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
plummercj:8358178_allthreads
Closed

8358178: Some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without#25557
plummercj wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
plummercj:8358178_allthreads

Conversation

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj commented May 30, 2025

Use -includevirtualthreads with tests use vm.allThreads() and pass with or without it. Using -includevirtualthreads gives us better virtual thread test coverage. Otherwise only the returned platform threads get tested.

Tested by running affected tests locally.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358178: Some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25557/head:pull/25557
$ git checkout pull/25557

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25557
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25557/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25557

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25557

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25557.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 30, 2025

👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 30, 2025

@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358178: Some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, lmesnik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 75 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8358178 8358178: some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without May 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 30, 2025

@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label May 30, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 30, 2025

Webrevs

@plummercj plummercj changed the title 8358178: some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without 8358178: Some nsk/jdi tests should be run with includevirtualthreads=y even though they pass without May 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 31, 2025
@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the reviews Serguei and Leonid!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Going to push as commit c382da5.
Since your change was applied there have been 77 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 3, 2025

@plummercj Pushed as commit c382da5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants