Skip to content

Conversation

@gauthamkrishnanibm
Copy link
Contributor

@gauthamkrishnanibm gauthamkrishnanibm commented Jun 16, 2025

Some methods in the java.time.chrono interfaces—ChronoLocalDate, ChronoLocalDateTime, and ChronoZonedDateTime—override methods from the java.time.temporal.Temporal interface that are documented to throw UnsupportedTemporalTypeException when given unsupported fields or units.

These overridden methods include:

with(TemporalField, long)

plus(long, TemporalUnit)

minus(long, TemporalUnit)

However, their Javadoc in the chrono interfaces does not mention the possibility of this exception, resulting in incomplete or inconsistent documentation. This contrasts with the parent Temporal interface, which explicitly documents the exception.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8359303 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8294226: Document missing UnsupportedTemporalTypeException (Bug - P4)
  • JDK-8359303: Document missing UnsupportedTemporalTypeException (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25836/head:pull/25836
$ git checkout pull/25836

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25836
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25836/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25836

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25836

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25836.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 16, 2025

👋 Welcome back gkrishnan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 16, 2025

@gauthamkrishnanibm This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8294226: Document missing UnsupportedTemporalTypeException

Reviewed-by: rriggs, naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 135 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RogerRiggs, @naotoj) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 16, 2025

@gauthamkrishnanibm The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Jun 16, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Jun 24, 2025
@gauthamkrishnanibm
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jun 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2025

@gauthamkrishnanibm
Your change (at version 15558c5) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@RogerRiggs
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Going to push as commit 54acadb.
Since your change was applied there have been 146 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jun 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2025

@RogerRiggs @gauthamkrishnanibm Pushed as commit 54acadb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants