Skip to content

Conversation

@sarannat
Copy link
Contributor

@sarannat sarannat commented Jun 23, 2025

Issue
Using the command java -Xcomp -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -XX:+TimeEachLinearScan results in an assert failure in line assert(_cached_blocks.length() == ir()->linear_scan_order()->length()) failed: invalid cached block list.

Suggestion
Removal of flag as this is a very old issue

Fix
Removed the flag by removing relevant methods and code while ensuring the removal does not affect other flags.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358641: C1 option -XX:+TimeEachLinearScan is broken (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25933/head:pull/25933
$ git checkout pull/25933

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25933
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25933/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25933

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25933

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25933.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back snatarajan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 23, 2025

@sarannat This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358641: C1 option -XX:+TimeEachLinearScan is broken

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 37 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@chhagedorn, @TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8358641: C1 option -XX:+TimeEachLinearScan is broken 8358641: C1 option -XX:+TimeEachLinearScan is broken Jun 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 23, 2025

@sarannat The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 23, 2025
@sarannat sarannat marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2025 09:57
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 24, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks reasonable, thanks for cleaning it up!

case counter_misc_inst: return "other instructions";
case counter_other_inst: return "misc. instructions";


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might have been added by a previous iteration. I suggest to remove it.

Suggested change

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 7, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 15, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@sarannat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the reviews. Please sponsor.

@sarannat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@chhagedorn
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jul 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 16, 2025

@sarannat
Your change (at version d66a4ce) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Going to push as commit 6b4a5ef.
Since your change was applied there have been 37 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jul 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 16, 2025

@chhagedorn @sarannat Pushed as commit 6b4a5ef.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants